GOP Candidate At Center Of Contested North Carolina Race Calls For New Election

Updated at 2:45 p.m. ET

After months of insisting he knew of no illegal activity being done on behalf of his campaign, Republican Mark Harris, who leads the race for North Carolina’s 9th congressional district, called Thursday for the State Board of Elections to hold a new election.

This is a breaking news story. The original story continues below and will be updated shortly.

An email first released to the public on Thursday shows that Republican congressional candidate Mark Harris requested to meet the man now at the center of a North Carolina investigation into illegal ballot practices in the 2018 primary and general elections.

The disclosure by the Harris campaign frustrated investigators, who were presented with the evidence only on Wednesday, despite a subpoena from the North Carolina State Board of Elections for the relevant documents months ago.

Harris is testifying before the board on Thursday, during its fourth day of hearings into the contested election in the state’s 9th Congressional District.

The board is trying to determine whether a new election needs to be called in the district, where Harris held a 905-vote lead over Democrat Dan McCready in the unofficial ballot tally after the November midterm elections. The board declined to certify those results pending its investigation into an absentee ballot scheme that investigators have been unspooling for months.

The investigation focuses on a political operative named McCrae Dowless who was hired by Harris to run get-out-the-vote efforts in Bladen and Robeson counties. Dowless was also investigated in 2016 for his tactics, which a number of witnesses have testified included illegally collecting absentee ballots and filling out some of those ballots.

Harris has said publicly since the investigation began in December that he was unaware of any illegal acts that may have been done on behalf of his campaign. He reiterated that in his testimony Thursday.

“He said we do not take the ballot,” Harris said, describing what Dowless told him. ” ‘I don’t care if it’s a 95-year-old woman in a wheelchair, we do not take the ballots.’ ”

The email produced by the attorney representing Harris’ campaign showed Harris reaching out to Judge Marion Warren about procuring Dowless’ help. Dowless worked for another candidate, Todd Johnson, who nearly swept Bladen County’s absentee ballot totals in 2016, and Harris refers to that victory in his email.

“On the other issue of your gracious offer to meet me in Bladen County and spend a day connecting me to the ‘key people’ that can help me carry that part of the county in a future US House NC-9 race,” Harris wrote to Warren on March 8, 2017. “You know the political and financial connections better than anyone else I would know, including the guy whose absentee ballot project for Johnson could have put me in the US House this term, had I known, and he had been helping us.”

But Harris’ son, John Harris, testified Wednesday that he warned his father that he thought Dowless was likely engaged in illegal practices as part of his operation.

John Harris says he reviewed the absentee ballot results of the 2016 race and concluded Dowless was using illegal tactics to help Johnson. During Wednesday’s hearing, John Harris said he warned his father about this, but that Mark Harris still hired Dowless.

Mark Harris was pressed about those warnings Thursday.

“It was painfully clear that he was saying, ‘Daddy don’t mess with this guy,’ ” said State Board member Jeff Carmon. “That was your son, with no ax to grind, that wanted to make sure you were protected.”

Harris said he never raised his son’s concerns with Dowless.

He also said that he disregarded the warnings because his son was only 27 years old and had never been to Bladen County, whereas he had sat down with Dowless and heard his guarantees that he wasn’t touching ballots.

The question of what Harris knew about the operation in the eastern part of the 9th District is important for State Board of Elections as it must decide whether any “improprieties” occurred to an extent that would cast doubt on the election’s fairness. If that is determined to be the case, the board has the authority to call a new election in the district.

The board is scheduled to vote on what to do at the end of the hearing, although it’s only become more unclear as to when that will be. The hearing was originally scheduled to last one or two days, but Chair Robert Cordle noted Thursday that it likely will stretch beyond this week.

Copyright 2019 NPR. To see more, visit https://www.npr.org.