The Vatican department charged with overseeing Catholic education released an extensive document Monday decrying what it calls a “crisis” on whether gender can be an individual choice rather than being set by God or biology.
The document describes a culture-wide “disorientation” that serves to “cancel out” the natural difference between man and woman, as well as “destabilise the family as an institution.”
The Congregation for Catholic Education says the goal of the 31-page guide is to “support those who work in the education of young people, so as to help them address in a methodical way (and in the light of the universal vocation to love of the human person) the most debated questions around human sexuality.”
The document entitled “Male and Female He Created Them” does not deviate from traditional Catholic teaching.
The timing of its release, however, during the heart of Pride Month, led some to wonder whether Vatican bureaucracy was making a point.
The text was dated Feb. 2, 2019, but was only made public more than four months later, around the time gay-rights supporters the world over gathered at rallies, parades and concerts honoring the LGBTQ community. The events are timed to coincide with the anniversary of the Stonewall Riots of 1969, widely considered to have launched the modern pride movement.
The document is co-signed by Cardinal Giuseppe Versaldi, the head of the education department, and Archbishop Angelo Vincenzo Zani, the secretary. Pope Francis did not sign it.
In the past, the pope has expressed sympathy for LGBTQ people.
But that support has not extended to transgender individuals, whose gender identity does not match the sex they were identified as having at birth.
In the 2015 book This Economy Kills: Pope Francis on Capitalism and Social Justice, Francis is quoted comparing gender theory, which allows one’s identity to exist along a spectrum, to nuclear arms annihilation.
On Monday, the Rev. James Martin, a writer and Jesuit priest, tweeted that while the Vatican document rightly calls for listening and dialogue, it “sets aside the real-life experiences of LGBT people.”
“Sadly, it will be used as a cudgel against transgender people, and an excuse to argue that they shouldn’t even exist,” he wrote.