By one projection, weekly jobless claims could surpass 2 million in this week’s report. By another, it could pass 3 million. That’s staggering when you consider that at the height of the Great Recession, initial claims topped out at just shy of 700,000.
The CARES Act (short for Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act) that Congress had agreed upon as of midday Wednesday is set to provide $2 trillion in economic aid as the nation braces for this massive economic blow.
“Nobody thinks legislation can end this. We cannot outlaw the virus. And no economic policy can fully end the hardship so long as the public health requires that we put so much of our commerce on ice,” said Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell on Wednesday. “This isn’t even a stimulus package. It is emergency relief.”
For households, the two main pillars of relief in the bill are direct payments and unemployment benefits. As of late Wednesday afternoon, the expanded unemployment benefits were threatening to hold up the bill’s passage.
According to experts, the sizable spending for individuals as laid out in the bill’s latest version will help protect Americans from severe economic pain, but some question whether it’s enough for the long run.
Relief checks for most Americans
A lot of the attention is being paid to the one-time checks that households will receive directly from the government.
The final version of the bill aims to send a $1,200 check to every adult earning up to $75,000 — or a $2,400 check for joint tax filers earning up to $150,000 — plus $500 for every child they have. Around 90% of households would benefit from the checks, according to the Tax Policy Center.
The check amounts would be phased out beyond those income limits, and no person earning over $99,000 (or couple earning over $198,000) would receive the benefits. (However, unlike earlier versions, there are no phase-in amounts; all individuals with incomes up to $75,000 will receive the same amount.)
What $1,200 buys
Put into perspective, $1,200 is a bit more than the median full-time U.S. worker gets per week — $936 as of the end of 2019.
It’s also a potentially sizable cushion for some households. More than 1 in 10 adults wouldn’t be able to cover an emergency $400 expense, and an additional 1 in 4 would need to borrow money or sell something, according to 2018 data from the Federal Reserve.
But what would $1,200 cover? We do know that housing is for many households the largest spending category. Median rent in the U.S. in 2017 was $1,012, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. Median mortgage costs, meanwhile, were $1,513 for households with a mortgage.
On average, a one-person household bought around $370 worth of food per month in 2018. A three-person household spent around $750 per month. So a $1,200 check would go a long way toward purchasing food.
Of course, household needs differ dramatically by place and size. Median rent in San Francisco is $2,200, whereas it is $1,091 in Phoenix and $891 in Omaha, Neb. And a family needing more space might pay a much higher mortgage or rent than a single person.
But the point is that Congress is acting quickly, says one political scientist. And these initial rebate checks are a simple blunt way to start helping some households.
“We’re living in an emergency situation. In an ideal world, we would have time to create adjusted cost-of-living amounts for everywhere in the country based on pretty specific data as to what it costs to raise what type of children, you know, which number of children and which state,” said Amy Castro Baker, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania who studies basic-income programs. “We don’t have that kind of time. People are losing their houses yesterday.”
In short, $1,200 (or $2,400 for a two-adult household) could in the immediate future be useful for a lot of people. But then, the crisis could last much longer — some public health experts say the need for social distancing could easily last for months.
That’s where longer-term measures, such as the unemployment insurance measures in this bill, will help.
Some low-wage workers could get more than their usual earnings
The expansion of unemployment benefits could stand to put even more money in some families’ pockets than the relief checks. New York Sen. Chuck Schumer has taken to calling it “unemployment insurance on steroids.”
“I think of this thing as a deep response and a broad response,” said Chuck Marr, senior director of federal tax policy at the left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. While the “broad” part is the checks, he said, “unemployment is a sort of deep response. People are losing jobs; they’re hurt; they need help.”
The latest versions of the bill expand unemployment benefits across several dimensions. First, the bill would extend regular unemployment benefits to last an additional 13 weeks. In most states, laid-off workers can get a maximum of 26 weeks of benefits.
The bill would also add four months of $600 weekly payments on top of the usual weekly unemployment checks. That is a large bump compared with usual unemployment benefits. According to the Labor Department, the average weekly benefit as of the end of February was about $372.
It’s also a large increase in benefits compared with those during the Great Recession, when the economic stimulus act added $25 to weekly unemployment checks.
Altogether, an additional $600, on top of those average benefits, would equal roughly 100% wage replacement for average workers — meaning some lower-income workers will get more than their usual wages from this expansion.
On top of that, the latest versions of the bill would expand who can get unemployment to people who wouldn’t otherwise be eligible for benefits, such as the self-employed and those in isolation or quarantine because of the virus.
This expansion of unemployment benefits threatened to hold up the bill’s passage Wednesday afternoon, as a group of Republican senators objected to the new unemployment provisions.
“We cannot encourage people to make more money in unemployment than we do in employment,” South Carolina Sen. Tim Scott told reporters on Capitol Hill on Wednesday.
There’s also some question as to how much economic pain these proposals wouldn’t protect people from. After all, the scars from this economic blow could last far longer than the four months that the $600 unemployment bump will last.
The package also contains far more than just this assistance for households. There are also loans for small businesses and provisions to make much of that loan money forgivable. The bill also would allow federal student loan borrowers a grace period from making payments until October.